5:30 P.M. TIMING - THE MEDIA SOURCE

It seems to have been DS Craig Dobbie, in a press briefing next morning and circulated by the Press Association:

Press Association

The Guardian

Tue 1 Jul 2003 12.29 EDT

_Police shocked at violent murder of teenager_

The body of a murdered teenager was found by members of her family shortly after she went missing, police said today.

Detective Superintendent Craig Dobbie, who is leading the investigation into the killing of 14-year-old Jodi Jones, told a press briefing that she was found in a wooded area behind a school in Dalkeith, Midlothian, by relatives who had alerted police to her disappearance.

"It's one of the most violent crimes I have experienced in my 28 years as a police officer," Mr Dobbie told reporters.

He said Jodi had left home at about 5.30pm and had been due back at 10pm. When she Failed to return, it is understood her mother phoned around friends before contacting the police.

(...)

"We would particularly appeal to anyone who uses this path, or was near it, between 5pm and 10pm last night to contact the incident room."

(End of extract)

 

The latter reference to "between 5pm and 10pm", seems to have resulted in confusion, as some newspaper articles within the next few days, report the time of Jodi leaving, as 5 p.m., whilst others maintain it to be 5:30 p.m., for example:

'The Mirror'

Wednesday, 3 July 

"It is believed she was seized shortly after leaving her house at around 5.30pm".

Quoting from the trial transcript of Allen Ovens, partner of Judith Jones, Jodi's mother:

Jodi left when I was in the toilet.

I see. How did you know that?

I heard the door bang.

You heard the door bang. All right. Now, having formed an estimate of the time that you returned home, Mr Ovens, namely about 4.40 pm/twenty-to-five, is it  possible, thinking back to the time you were getting changed and getting washed to give an estimate of what time you heard the door bang?

I would think between quarter and ten-to.

Quarter and ten-to?

Five.

(End of extract)

There were differing times given in various statements by Mr Ovens and in his original account, he went to wash up at 5:10 p.m., during which he heard the front door closing.

The final outcome is statedly an estimate, based on CCTV footage from a local Tesco garage at 4:31 p.m. and assumptions then derived.


Ultimately, it remains unresolved why our initial press briefing, informed the media that Jodi had left home, at 5:30 p.m.

However, we may have an explanation for the following, with regard to the recreation, on Sunday 7 July, of Jodi's last known movements:

'Daily Record'

Monday, 8 July

"The reconstruction began at exactly 4.55pm - a week to the minute since Jodi was last seen alive near her home in Easthouses, Midlothian".

Why specifically 4:55 p.m.?

Do the police already have complete trust in the statement given by Andrina Bryson, on Wednesday 4 July?

Quoting from the trial transcript:

And if we add 5 minutes on again for packing and getting to the car, I believe we'd get ourselves 16:54. 5 to 5?

Uh-huh,

There is only 5 minutes between the two. So somewhere around about 10 to 5, 5 to 5, give or take a couple of minutes?

Uh-huh.

Do you remember, Mrs Bryson, when you first contacted the police about seeing these two (incomprehensible)?

I do, yeah, I do, yes.

When was that?

It was the Tuesday and I had gone out to work and I think I was possibly at a client's house. I think it was on TV or I don't remember exactly how, but I realised I had passed that day (incomprehensible).

(...)

You would learn the next day, the Tuesday, that there had been a killing ?

Uh-huh

And you decided that you would contact the police?

Yes.

And they came, I think, on the Wednesday to take a statement from you ? (Incomprehensible).

And they came to your house to do that ?

They did, yeah.

(End of extract)

Should that be the situation and time of Jodi leaving, resultantly being influenced, it consequently impacts on the purported time of death being 5:15 p.m.

How reliable would you consider the aforementioned evidence, encompassing all therein, to be?


An invitation is extended to join a cordial, Facebook group community, where many members are relatedly, vastly experienced, varying views can be expressed and research updates regularly posted:

Luke Mitchell Research Discussions


LINK TO TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AVAILABILITY OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS - THE RECENT TIMELINE

Image
24 September, 2023 'Bob Ruff podcast' During this discussion, Bob Ruff notes that 'court files', are readily available in the U.S., to which Sandra Lean responds: "No, they're not made public over here, at all. Certain documents, like the appeal documents, are made public, but that's it. And trial transcripts are massively expensive, hugely and although I have the defence papers, it's actually an offence for me to share them, to third parties who are not directly working on this case. So, if we were to put them on line, for example, they're gonna come through me. Simple as that and that's why I can take excerpts and I can show excerpts, but the minute I start to put full documents out, that's when I cross the line". Circa 4:45 minutes into the  full interview recording. 15 October, 2023 'Bob Ruff podcast' Sandra Lean begins: The first question is actually not on the list, it only came up in the last couple of days. You will reme
Read more

SCOTTISH COURTS & TRIBUNALS CONFIRM FACTS REGARDING TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

Image
The following attachments are a copy of my 25 June, 2024 correspondence and resulting reply. As became evident during past 6 months, despite assertions otherwise, the Luke Mitchell case trial transcripts have always been available to everyone. A reference to both the 1993 Order and 1995 Act is germane, as the long superceded 1993 Order is cited by Sandra Lean, author of related book, 'Innocents Betrayed' (2018) and foremost campaigner for a miscarriage of justice, in support of incessant and erroneous claims that the case trial transcripts are not available to members of the public. Effectively, Luke Mitchell's trial was held in an open court and reported on daily by the media. These transcripts are a verbatim account of each day's proceedings, incorporating legal arguments which the jury were not always permitted to hear and occasionally required to leave the courtroom. The related background is comprehensively documented here: AVAILABILITY OF TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS - THE
Read more

THE PARKA JACKET: A DETAILED ANALYSIS

Image
On Monday 30 July, 2003, at approximately 5:45 p.m., Rosemary Walsh was driving along Newbatttle Road, accompanied by her brother's partner, Lorraine Fleming and heading towards Newtongrange, when a male spotted against a wooden gate, caught their attention. It was a 'five bar' gate, situated on the right-hand side of Newbatttle Road and slightly further along, on the left-hand side, was Roan's Dyke Path. Next day, they both become aware that a local schoolgirl', 14-year- old Jodi Jones, had been murdered. It was only subsequent to learning of the murder scene location and realising is was relatively close to their sighting, that they contacted police. On 2 December, 2004 and appearing as a trial witness, Rosemary Walsh confirmed, "I think it was a couple of days later". Should it have been Luke Mitchell, then it would necessitate crossing over Newbatttle Bridge and he clams never to have travelled further than Barondale cottages, situated before the bridg
Read more